Skip to content
Fusion Industry Association
  • ABOUTExpand
    • ABOUT THE FIA
    • STAFF
    • BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
  • POLICYExpand
    • PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    • REGULATORY CERTAINTY
    • SCALING THE INDUSTRY
  • NEWSExpand
    • FROM THE FIAExpand
      • BLOG
      • INDUSTRY REPORTS
      • FUSION NEWS VIDEOS
    • FUSION IN THE NEWS
    • FOR THE MEDIA
  • MEMBERSHIPExpand
    • FULL MEMBERS
    • AFFILIATE MEMBERS
    • EDUCATION & RESEARCH PARTNERS
  • EVENTSExpand
    • EVENTS
    • FUSION SUPPLY CHAIN TRADE SHOW
    • UK FUSION FORUM 2026
  • LEARNExpand
    • ABOUT FUSION ENERGY
    • FAQ
    • FUSION VS. FISSION
    • PATH TO COMMERCIAL FUSION
  • CONTACT
BECOME A MEMBER
Fusion Industry Association

Milestone-Based Public-Private Partnership Cost-Share Program for Fusion Power

Partnering with Governments
Other Supporting Comments to the DoE RFI
All comments are available on the Federal Register

[This Post has been updated to include further details about Fusion Public Private Partnerships]

The U.S. Department of Energy is exploring ideas on how to develop a performance-based cost share program to support the development of fusion energy in the United States.

On April 20, 2020, the U.S. Department of Energy published an RFI (Request for Information) in the Federal Register asking for input on how to design a Cost Share program for fusion reactor technologies. It says, “exploring cost share partnership programs where the funding is provided directly to the private-sector companies under a performance-based milestone-driven approach.”

The Fusion Industry Association has been pushing to create a new public private partnership with the U.S. government, specifically asking the Department of Energy and leaders in the U.S. Congress to support such a cost-share program from the U.S. government. FIA Members have looked at other models throughout the U.S. government for successful technology development and deployment programs – specific examples include the DoE Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) program that is supporting the licensing of new nuclear power plants, and NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program.

Along with the support for such a program in the Community Planning Program, FESAC, and the ongoing DoE report mandated by Congress, there is a growing body of support to show how effective a new partnership could be.

This post shows background, the FIA’s public comment, FIA Members comments, and the public responses of other stakeholders in support of Public Private Partnerships.

FIA Public Comment in Support of a Cost-Share Program
The FIA submitted public comment on the RFI on May 1, 2020. The full, signed comment is embedded below, and will be available in the Federal Record and Regulations.gov.
Other Supporting Comments to the DoE RFI
All comments are available on the Federal Register
FIA Resources

Below is a selection of previously published and circulated documents in support of creating a new public-private cost-share partnership.

2021 FIA Appropriations Request to Congress
FIA Principles of Design for Public Private Partnerships
FIA Response to House Science Committee Request for Information on Stimulus Proposals
OUTSIDE RESOURCES

Below are papers detailing model public-private partnerships that have been successful in supporting technology development.

“Commercial Orbital Transportation Services: A New Era in Spaceflight.” 
The final report chronicling the historical foundations and results of NASA’s COTS program
(Published May 2014)
NASA’s Lessons Learned Report on Commercial Orbital Transportation Services

April 20th, 2020

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
Tags: Post Tags: Press Release |

Post navigation

Previous Previous
Hydrogen-boron fusion could be a dream come true
NextContinue
More Federal Interest in Private Fusion: DOE Seeks Input on Possible Cost Share Program to Support Private Fusion Energy Companies
Fusion Industry Association - the voice of the private fusion industry

ABOUT
POLICY
MEMBERSHIP
NEWS
FAQ
MEDIA
LEARN
EVENTS
CONTACT

FOLLOW FUSION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

  • YouTube
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Bluesky

Subscribe and get fusion industry updates and stay on top of global fusion progress.

* indicates required

© 2026 Fusion Industry Association - Messaging, design and development by Mind Over Markets

Common Fusion Approaches

Magnetic confinement: Plasma is heated to 100 million °C or more, then squeezed and held in place by strong magnetic fields, allowing many fusion reactions to occur. (Example: tokamaks, stellarators)

Inertial confinement: Tiny fuel pellets are struck by powerful lasers. The outer layer explodes outward, compressing the core to fusion conditions for a few nanoseconds, producing a brief but intense pulse of energy from each pellet. (Example: National Ignition Facility)

Hybrid systems: Combine compression (e.g., from lasers, plasma pistons, or mechanical impact) with moderate magnetic fields to reduce energy losses and improve confinement.

Electrostatic fusion: Uses high electric potentials to accelerate ions toward a central reaction zone, causing them to collide at high energies and fuse. The ions are guided and confined by electric fields rather than magnets, creating a compact environment for fusion reactions.

  • ABOUT
    • ABOUT THE FIA
    • STAFF
    • BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
  • POLICY
    • PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    • REGULATORY CERTAINTY
    • SCALING THE INDUSTRY
  • NEWS
    • FROM THE FIA
      • BLOG
      • INDUSTRY REPORTS
      • FUSION NEWS VIDEOS
    • FUSION IN THE NEWS
    • FOR THE MEDIA
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • FULL MEMBERS
    • AFFILIATE MEMBERS
    • EDUCATION & RESEARCH PARTNERS
  • EVENTS
    • EVENTS
    • FUSION SUPPLY CHAIN TRADE SHOW
    • UK FUSION FORUM 2026
  • LEARN
    • ABOUT FUSION ENERGY
    • FAQ
    • FUSION VS. FISSION
    • PATH TO COMMERCIAL FUSION
  • CONTACT